Aller au contenu principal

Thèse Comment les Croyances des Parents Concernant l'Esprit de leur Nourrisson Influencent leurs Premiers Échanges H/F

Doctorat.Gouv.Fr

  • Grenoble - 38
  • CDD
  • Bac +5
  • Service public d'état
  • Exp. - 1 an
  • Exp. 1 à 7 ans
  • Exp. + 7 ans
Lire dans l'app

Les missions du poste

The first aim of this project will be to design and validate a questionnaire to measure parents' beliefs about their Infants' Minds and Learning (the BIMLq). BIMLq will be based on past measures1-4, but expand on them in order to build a psychometrically sound questionnaire that can be used in the general population. It will combine both open-ended and closed questions in order to obtain a complete picture of parents' intuitive theories about the ontogeny of thoughts. With the data collected with BIMLq, we will then explore how parents' intuitive theories relate to the genealogy of innatism and empiricism in philosophy, and to the way these theories changed over time with the spread of scientific knowledge, progressively incorporating elements from both traditions to reach more pluralistic views in contemporary cognitive sciences and philosophy.

In the second axis of our project, we will conduct a large-scale study with an online distribution of the BIMLq in several countries to ask: (i) are there systematic biases towards innatism or empiricism in the general population, and do they vary with parenthood? (ii) how diverse are these beliefs? (iii) do they systematically vary, for instance as function of parents' levels of education, gender, country or residence, or whether there are some neurodevelopmental disorders in their family? (iv) where do these parental BIMLs come from? (v) how do they change as infants' age?

Finally, in a third axis of research, we will examine whether parents' BIMLs impact how much, how contingently, and how specifically they speak with their child while at home, and whether this in turn impacts infants' vocal and linguistic development. To do so, we will conduct a longitudinal study in which we will collect home recordings, as well as the BIMLq and measures of infants' vocal (babbling) and lexical (vocabulary size) development between 4- and 18-months. Axis 1. Conception and validation of the BIML. We will design a mixed-methods questionnaire (combining both open-ended and closed questions) which can be completed in an interview format or autonomously (e.g., online). The BIMLq is based on previous measures of mind-mindedness, parental reflective functioning, caregiving practices and experimental philosophy, as well as novel items that we designed ourselves. We identified a typology of BIMLs that are widely present in a varied corpus of texts (scientific, philosophical, parenting websites...) to design these novel items. We are currently testing some of them in a pilot study (alongside established measures of mind mindedness for a comparison), which is part of a wider study where we collect home recordings of parents and infants who are 4- and 7-months-old. The sample size for this preregistered study is 50, and its aim is to assess infants' vocal development and self-recognition, and their link to caregivers' input (social contingency, quantity of input, etc.). We will use this pilot data to further inform our design of the BIML, by drawing on an automatic transcription of parents' speech while talking about their child, and their response on a beta version of the BIML. BIML is currently designed with 4 sub-items, from which we can extract 4 scores: (1) the cognitive agency score measures parents' tendency to attribute various types of cognitive states (e.g., memories...) to their own infant; (2) the communicative agency score measures parental interpretations of their infant's vocalizations as communicative acts; (3) the emotional versus cognitive contents ratio reflects the relative focus parents make on their infant's emotional experiences versus cognitive activities; (4) the innatism-empiricism score measures parents tendency to conceive their infants' development in terms of maturation versus learning.

Once we have a satisfactory version of the BIMLq, we will validate it by running an online study on Prolific with a sample size that will be determined with a power analysis using the pilot data.

To relate parents' intuitive theories to philosophical theories of innateness and empiricism, we will draw on an in-depth review of the philosophical literature on concept innatism and empiricism, and the experimental philosophy literature, and draw parallels between these theories and our BIMLq data. We will write a theoretical paper to summarize these theoretical contributions. This work will also be informed by our second axis of research.

Axis 2. Online study to describe parental BIML.
We will conduct an online study to collect descriptive data using the BIMLq. We will collect data from parents when the mother is in her third trimester of pregnancy, and then when the infant is 4, 7, 12, 18, 24, and 36-months-old (these ages are chosen because they correspond to specific developmental milestones in typically developing infants). We will collect sociodemographic information (level of education, origin, gender) to examine their potential links with BIMLs. We will also examine whether developmental milestones (e.g., the first steps, words...) and/or chronological age impact parental BIMLs, and whether BIML systematically vary across countries . We will start with a comparison between France, the United Kingdom, and Spain , but hope to be able to expand to other countries and languages later on. The BIMLq takes less than 30 minutes to fill in, and parents will be remunerated 5€ for their participation.

Axis 3. Longitudinal study with home recordings. We will follow families longitudinally when their infants are 4, 7, 12, and 18-months-old. At the age of 4, 7 and 12-months of age, we will do a home visit. During each visit parents will complete the BIMLq, and record themselves during a typical weekend with their child. From these recordings, infant vocalizations and parental speech will be automatically extracted and we will compute: (i) the proportion of speech directed to the infant; (ii) social contingency, and (iii) the extent to which parents change their register when addressing their infant. When infants are 18-month-old, parents will fill in a standardized questionnaire to evaluate their language acquisition.

Le profil recherché

Le ou la candidate aura un master recherche en psychologie ou neurosciences, ainsi qu'une expérience déjà substantielle de la recherche avec les nourrissons et familles. Une expérience d'analyse de données sera aussi requise, ainsi que de bonnes compétences relationelles.

Bienvenue chez Doctorat.Gouv.Fr

Établissement : Université Grenoble Alpes École doctorale : ISCE - Ingénierie pour la Santé la Cognition et l'Environnement Laboratoire de recherche : Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neuro Cognition Direction de la thèse : Louise GOUPIL ORCID 0000000343429408 Début de la thèse : 2026-10-01 Date limite de candidature : 2026-06-01T23:59:59 La quantité, la contingence, et la prosodie avec laquelle les parents parlent avec leurs enfants jouent un rôle central pour leur acquisition du langage, ainsi que d'autres dimensions de leur développement. Par exemple, la quantité de langage entendu par un nourrisson est le premier prédicteur de la taille de son vocabulaire, au-delà de facteurs comme le niveau d'éducation ou le multilinguisme. On sait également que la façon qu'ont les parents de parler avec leur nourrisson varie fortement d'une famille à l'autre, et comprendre l'origine de cette variabilité est crucial, car les différences précoces de compétences langagières contribuent ensuite à construire des inégalités dans d'autres domaines. Les avancées récentes en traitement automatique des langues permettent désormais d'analyser finement les interactions vocales et verbales entre les parents et leurs nourrissons enregistrées à leur domicile. Ce type d'approche permet de décrire le type de parole adressée à un nourrisson dans son quotidien, mais elle ne suffit pas à expliquer pourquoi les parents parlent différemment à leur enfant. Un facteur explicatif potentiel, qui a largement été négligé jusqu'à aujourd'hui, est celui des croyances parentales concernant l'esprit et l'apprentissage de leur nourrisson (Croyances à propos de l'Esprit et de l'Apprentissage du Nourrisson, CEAN). Il est possible que ces croyances, et en particulier, l'adhérence à des théories intuitives innéistes (mettant l'accent sur la maturation biologique) ou empiristes (mettant l'accent sur l'apprentissage), façonnent la façon dont les parents parlent avec leur enfant. En outre, ces croyances sont particulièrement intéressantes car elles sont, en principe, modifiables, ce qui pourrait donner lieu à des recherches appliquées intéressante dans le futur. S'inscrivant à la croisée de la psychologie du développement et de la philosophie expérimentale, ce projet repose sur l'hypothèse que les CEANs s'organisent autour de tendances innéistes ou empiristes, héritées de la tradition philosophique opposant l'inné et l'acquis. Il vise trois objectifs : (1) développer et valider un questionnaire (BIMLq) permettant de mesurer ces croyances dans la population générale ; (2) étudier leur distribution, leurs déterminants sociodémographiques, et leur évolution en fonction de l'âge de l'enfant ; (3) examiner leur impact sur les pratiques langagières parentales et le développement vocal et lexical des nourrissons, à l'aide d'une étude longitudinale dans laquelle nous collecterons des enregistrements à domicile, le questionnaire BIMLq, ainsi que des mesures concernant le développement langagier de nourrissons entre 4 et 18 mois. Cette combinaison unique de méthodes et de concepts apportera des contributions empiriques et théoriques inédites, avec des perspectives applicatives pour l'amélioration des pratiques parentales en lien avec l'acquisition du langage. The quantity, contingency and prosody of parents' speech during proto-conversations with their infants play a key role in their early language acquisition, as well as other developmental outcomes. We know for instance that the quantity of language heard by typically developing infants is the best predictor of their own verbal production, over and beyond other predictors such as maternal education, or multilingualism. We also know that the social contingency of parents' speech (how closely in time it happens with respect to the infants' own behaviors), and the extent to which they use the infant-directed speech register (IDS), also matter for infants' language development. We also know that all of these features of parental speech greatly vary from one parent to the next. Explaining this variability and its impact on language acquisition is an important field of enquiry, especially given the importance of language for learning other skills, and the fact that early-emerging variability in linguistic skills paves the way for later emerging inequalities in other domains. Understanding what predicts the way parents talk to their children is therefore a central question for developmental psychology. The project has three complementary axes.

Publiée le 11/05/2026 - Réf : cf23e6db1c94568a7e202c1d205ca785

Finalisez votre candidature

sur le site du partenaire

Créez votre compte
Hellowork et postulez

sur le site du partenaire !

Ces offres pourraient aussi
vous intéresser

CIRIL GROUP recrutement
CIRIL GROUP recrutement
Meylan - 38
CDI
Télétravail partiel
Voir l’offre
il y a 24 jours
Voir plus d'offres
Les sites
L'emploi
  • Offres d'emploi par métier
  • Offres d'emploi par ville
  • Offres d'emploi par entreprise
  • Offres d'emploi par mots clés
L'entreprise
  • Qui sommes-nous ?
  • On recrute
  • Accès client
Les apps
Nous suivre sur :
Informations légales CGU Politique de confidentialité Gérer les traceurs Accessibilité : non conforme Aide et contact